Legal Opinion
Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 7, 1993No. 92-7156, 92-7200PublishedCited by 264 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
2Per curiam
Appellant Michael Sindram, a frequent filer in the courts of the District of Columbia, sued in the United States District Court seeking compensatory and punitive damages from two judges and several clerks of the D.C. Superior Court. The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous and malicious and denied as moot his postjudgment motion to reinstate his claims, which was filed two months after the dismissal. In dismissing the complaint, the court relied on the doctrine of absolute judicial immunity, noting cases…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- David M. Foster v. Lawrence J. Walsh, Clerk, Akron Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by264 opinions
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Rodriguez v. WeprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Rodriguez v. WeprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Moore v. MotzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Caldwell v. KaganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.