Legal Opinion
Stokes v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 16, 2004No. 01-5432PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG.
GINSBURG, Chief Judge:
Cedric Stokes challenges the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his petition Stokes claimed the United States Parole Commission violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution of the United States by denying him parole and determining his parole rehearing date on the basis of regulations and guidelines promulgated after the crimes of which he was convicted. On appeal, another panel of this Court concluded the district court lacked jurisdiction over the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ex Parte EndoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- John Doe v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Jeong Seon Han v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Fletcher, Thaddeus v. Reilly, EdwardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Roger Day, Jr. v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Abu Ali v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.