Bidart Bros. v. Elmo Farming Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Bidart Bros. (Bidart), plaintiff and appellant, sued Elmo Farming Company (Elmo), defendant and respondent, to recover rents collected by Elmo on behalf of Bidart. The rents were on lands sold to Bidart by Elmo but subject to certain leases. The trial court permitted Elmo to set off the rents against claims asserted under purchase price promissory notes and deeds of trust. Bidart appeals.
Facts
This case requires an occult skill on behalf of the trial court and this court to perceive the real intent of the parties involved in a complicated real estate transaction where the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Balboa Insurance v. AguirreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kellis v. RingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979