Legal Opinion

Lee v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2000No. S077289PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

Petitioner Randolph Lee faces trial for “falsely personating] another in either his private or official capacity, and in such assumed character” doing “any other act whereby . . . any benefit might accrue to the party personating . . . .” (Pen. Code, § 529, subd. 3; all undesignated statutory references are to this code.) We granted review to decide whether this statute may be violated by impersonating 1 someone who is, at the time impersonated, deceased. We answer the question affirmatively, and hence affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal denying the writ of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. RathertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. United States v. MacIel-alcalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Collier v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. State v. Security Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. CoveyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API