Legal Opinion
United States v. MacIel-alcala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 2010No. 19-55869PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is granted. The prior opinion filed on March 25, 2010, and reported at 598 F.3d 1239, is vacated concurrent with the filing of an Amended Opinion today.
With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to reject appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judges Wardlaw and Callahan vote to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Canby so recommends.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en bane and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Lyons v. Litton Loan Servicing LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. Doren WardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. Graciela Zuniga-ArteagaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.