State v. Security Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. McCutchen & Willard and McCutchen, Willard, Hannon & Greene for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J.—
This is an action by the state of California to declare an escheat of certain bank deposits, under the provisions of section 1273 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment was given for the plaintiff in the court below. The defendant bank alone appeals.
Section 1273 declares that when money is on deposit in a bank in this state and the depositor does not for a period of more than twenty years deposit any more money in the account, nor draw out any part thereof, nor claim the same, and neither the depositor nor any claimant has filed with the bank any notice of his present residence,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cunnius v. Reading School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Mercury Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
- Clovis National Bank v. CallawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. Van SkanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.