Legal Opinion

Bahjat v. Dadi

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 3, 2010No. AC 30252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, C. J.

The plaintiffs, Nabil S. Bahjat and Barbara Bahjat, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a court trial, in favor of the defendant Ahmed A. Dadi 1 on counts two and three of the operative complaint. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) found that the defendant was exempt from the registration requirement for home improvement contractors pursuant to General Statutes § 20-420, and (2) failed to award damages to the plaintiffs pursuant to General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), and General…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Connecticut Education Ass'n v. Milliman USA, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. MJM Landscaping, Inc. v. LorantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Blacker v. CrapoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ursini v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Estate of Bochicchio v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API