Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Darren J. Robison

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 16, 2016No. 72260-3-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

¶1 Before an officer gives a breath test to a person reasonably believed to be driving under the influence, an officer must provide that driver with certain warnings required by statute. Here, the State asks this court to reverse a superior court decision suppressing breath test results because the officer omitted the statutorily required warnings about marijuana. The State contends that a defendant must show prejudice before a court can suppress breath test results because of incomplete warnings. Thus, because the breath test administered to Darren J. Robison could not measure the active…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BartelsWashington Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. RobisonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API