State Of Washington v. Darren J. Robison
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.
¶1 Before an officer gives a breath test to a person reasonably believed to be driving under the influence, an officer must provide that driver with certain warnings required by statute. Here, the State asks this court to reverse a superior court decision suppressing breath test results because the officer omitted the statutorily required warnings about marijuana. The State contends that a defendant must show prejudice before a court can suppress breath test results because of incomplete warnings. Thus, because the breath test administered to Darren J. Robison could not measure the active…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BartelsWashington Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. RobisonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 2016