Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2016No. Nos. 92930-1; 92944-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 Washington State citizens decriminalized the recreational use of cannabis by initiative. The main psychoactive compound in cannabis is tetrahydrocannabi-nol (THC). The initiative established a legal limit for THC concentration in the blood while driving and amended the implied consent statute to direct officers to warn drivers of the legal consequences of a breath test that revealed that concentration. Unfortunately, no breath test available at the time measured THC concentrations in the blood. Our legislature has since amended the implied consent statute so it no longer…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BostromWashington Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City Of Kent v. Joanne KandlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. State Of Washington v. Scott Brian RehmusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State of Washington v. Jiovanny JimenezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State v. Chelan County Dist. CourtWashington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API