State Department of Highways, Division of Highways v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
We granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals erred when it held that the State Department of Highways (Highways) could not condemn a private way of necessity over railroad tracks owned by respondent, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (Railroad). State Dep’t of Highways v. Denver & Rio Grande W. R.R., 757 P.2d 181 (Colo. Ct.App.1988). The trial court granted Highways’ condemnation of a private crossing over the Railroad’s property based on its conclusion that the crossing was for a private way of necessity and, as such, was not subject to the jurisdiction of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Brown v. McAnallyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Coquina Oil Corp. v. Harry Kourlis RanchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Minto v. LambertColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Department of Transportation v. StapletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Brotman v. East Lake Creek Ranch, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Akin v. Four Corners EncampmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bear Creek Development Corp. v. Genesee FoundationColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.