Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Fairlamb

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 18, 1963No. 20198PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

Defendants in error, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, will be referred to as plaintiffs in this opinion. They alleged that they have a right-of-way for a recently constructed road to the south half of the Bradley claim across mining property owned by defendant. The issues were made by an amended complaint and the answer thereto. Trial was had to the court with an advisory jury, with the result that plaintiffs obtained judgment for the right-of-way claimed plus damages of $150.00. The judgment entered was based upon the existence of an implied easement, stemming from a common grantor,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martino v. FleenorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Jones v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Crotty v. New River & Pocahontas Consolidated Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Scott v. BoheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Pevear v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. Minto v. LambertColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Close v. RensinkIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API