Brotman v. East Lake Creek Ranch, L.L.P.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
In this appeal, we hold that because the Colorado Enabling Act imposes a trust on the state of Colorado to manage the school lands given to Colorado for the benefit of Colorado's public schools, and not for the benefit of taxpayers at large, the East Lake Creek Ranch does not have standing to enjoin a Land Board transaction as a trust beneficiary, as a taxpayer, or as an adjacent land owner.
The Ranch sued to enjoin the operation of an agreement between the Petitioners State Board of Land Commissioners (Land Board or Board) and Robert Brotman in which Brotman would gain title to school land…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Dynes v. HooverSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cooper v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Branson School District Re-82 v. RomerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ainscough v. OwensSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Director of the Office of State Lands & Investments v. Merbanco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- West Farms Mall, LLC v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Friends of the Black Forest Regional Park, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.