Legal Opinion
Minto v. Lambert
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1993No. 92CA1393PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge BRIGGS.
Defendant, Bill Lambert, appeals the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Keith and Georgina Minto, on their claim for condemnation of a private way of necessity on Lambert’s property. He asserts that the court did not have subject matter jurisdiction; the Mintos failed to establish that they were entitled to the easement; the amount of compensation awarded by the court was inadequate; and he should have been awarded attorney fees. We affirm.
Lambert owns approximately 22.5 acres of mostly undeveloped real property. The Min-tos own a parcel of property adjoining…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Mesolella v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- In the Interest of ClintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- In re the Marriage of StroudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Forbes v. GoldenhershColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Miller v. ROWTECH, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.