Coquina Oil Corp. v. Harry Kourlis Ranch
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice.
Coquina Oil Corporation, N.F.C. Petroleum Corporation, and Hanson Oil Corporation (collectively, Coquina) appeal from the judgment of the Rio Blanco County District Court dismissing their petition in condemnation, which sought a private way of necessity across the land of the appellee, Harry Kourlis Ranch (Kourlis). The district court held that Coquina, a federal oil and gas lessee, could not assert the right to condemn private property for private use provided by Colo.Const. Art. II, § 14 and section 38-1-102(3), C.R.S.1973, and consequently dismissed Coquina’s petition for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fritz v. Regents of the University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Lamborn v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. StapletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Akin v. Four Corners EncampmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Corp. v. LembkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- State Department of Highways, Division of Highways v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State Department of Highways, Division of Highways v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.