Legal Opinion

Glickman v. Glasner

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1964No. Civ. 28013PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

— Plaintiffs sued certain defendants for damages for libel resulting from the publication and dissemination of an allegedly malicious and opprobrious document 1 over the signature of defendant Rahbi Juda Glasner. Rabbi -Juda Glasner is the Kosher Pood Law Representative in the Department of Public Health of the State of California and as such moved the court for an order dismissing the complaint as to him and for a summary judgment in his favor. Certain other defendants filed answers to the complaint and the matter is at issue as to them. They are not involved in this appeal. Rabbi Glasner’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. Chase Securities, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sava v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API