Legal Opinion

Sava v. Fuller

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1967No. Civ. 11375PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

In a wrongful death action involving the death of a child, her parents sued both the child’s attending physician for malpractice (a count not involved on this appeal), and in a separate count Thomas Fuller, Ph.D., a botanist employed by the state, two Doe defendants (not served), and the state itself. The appeal is from a judgment after an order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrers of the defendants named in this count.

We decide the question whether the complaint did or could state a cause of action against the state, or the botanist, or both. A reversal will follow our decision…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Union Trust Company, United States of America v. Union Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Mann v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Barner v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API