Legal Opinion

Eau Claire County v. Milwaukee County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The issue on this áppeal is whether the evidence at the hearing before the department established as a matter of law that Mrs. Carden had gained a legal settlement, under sec. 49.10 (4), Stats. 1955,1 in Milwaukee at the expiration of the one-year period beginning April 27, 1956, when she first commenced to reside there.

In two well-considered decisions of this court authored respectively by Mr. Justice (later Chief Justice) Brown and Mr. Justice Wingert it was held that the term “residence” as used in sec. 49.10, Stats. 1955, was the equivalent of domicile. Carlton v. Department of Public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Will of EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Seibold v. WahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Town of Carlton v. State Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Marathon County v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Doern v. CrawfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. County of Dane v. Racine CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. Estate of DanielsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Dodge v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API