Legal Opinion

Estate of Daniels

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1972No. 220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

At the time the will was made and at the time of the probate of the will, under Wisconsin law a husband had no right to elect against his wife’s will. However, under sec. 861.05, Stats., created by ch. 339, sec. 26, Laws of 1969, which became effective April 1, 1971, a husband is now given the right of an election. However, the right of election by the husband existed under the Ohio law in force at the time of the death.

At the time of Mrs. Daniels’ death, a county court in Wisconsin had probate jurisdiction of the wills “of all persons deceased who were at the time of their decease…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of DaggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. In re GarneauCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
  3. Will of EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hartzler v. RadekaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Heymann v. LuchsingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 45,581 Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Joseph LeeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Eastman v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank v. TressingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Opinion No. Oag 25-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API