Legal Opinion

Marathon County v. Milwaukee County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingeRT, J.

The ultimate question presented by the appeal is whether Davidson had a legal settlement in Marathon county on April 10, 1945, when his children were committed to the state public school. The controlling statutory provisions are the following:

Sec. 49.02 (4), Stats. 1941:

“Every person of full age who shall have resided in any town, village, or city in this state one whole year shall thereby gain a settlement therein; but no residence of a person in any town, village, or city while supported therein as a pauper . . . shall operate to give such person a settlement therein. . . ”

Sec. 49.02 (7),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Will of EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Town of Carlton v. State Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Milwaukee County v. State Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eau Claire County v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. (1972), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1972
  3. Eau Claire County v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Eau Claire County v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Marathon County v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API