Legal Opinion
Hawkeye Commodity Promotions, Inc. v. Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 24, 2007No. 06-2406PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
In March 2006, Iowa enacted legislation ending the TouchPlay lottery game. Hawkeye Commodity Promotions, Inc., a licensed TouchPlay retailer, tried to enjoin the law before it took effect. Hawkeye argued that the law violates the Contracts, Takings, Equal Protection, and Due Process clauses of the federal constitution. The district court 1 rejects these claims. See Hawkeye Commodity Promotions, Inc. v. Miller, 432 F.Supp.2d 822 (N.D.Iowa 2006). Hawkeye appeals, reiterating those claims and asserting that the district court should have admitted the deposition testimony of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Tom Brakke and Rhonda Brakke D/B/A/ Pine Ridge Hunting Lodge, and McBra, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Iowa Natural Resource CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Hawkeye Commodity Promotions, Inc. v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.