Electrolytic Copper Co. v. Rambler Consol. Mines Corp.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Justice.
This is a statutory action to recover the possession of real property. The judgment of the district court on a trial without a jury was for the plaintiff, and the interested defendant brings error. The parties will be called plaintiff and defendant as in the court below.
The property consists of ten lode mining claims, named Rambler, Rambler No. 2, Rambler No. 3, Rambler No. 4, Rambler No. 5, Isabella No. 1, Isabella No. 2, Isabella No. 3, Isabella No. 4, and Strangler. Their total area is something less than 200 acres in sections 4 and 5, twp. 14, and sections 32 and 33 in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eldridge v. KuehlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Buty v. GoldfinchWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Zink v. . McManusNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Mason v. CrowderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Matteson v. EllsworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lind v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Denny v. StevensWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Goodrich v. StobbeWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Walker v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- White v. WoodsWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.