Legal Opinion

Miller v. Murphy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1946No. 8650PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lindquist

Appeal from a judgment quieting title in certain real property known as the Housum Placer Mining claim in Missoula county.

The Plaintiff Ed Miller in a quiet title action, by complaint in usual form, claimed an undivided 2/16ths interest in the property and alleged that the defendant R. C. Dempster had operated the placer mine on said property during 1940, 1941 and 1942 and had deposited royalty payments therefrom in the First National Bank at Missoula in the sum of $12,900 to which Miller claimed his proportionate share.

Various of the defendants named in the complaint appeared in the action…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Dickinson v. Arkansas City Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Lind v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Cullen v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lamont v. VingerMontana Supreme Court · 1921

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barcus v. GalbreathMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Chapin v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In Re Van Voast's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Register v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API