Legal Opinion

Graf v. Continental Western Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2004No. 03-054PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Karen Graf (Graf) appeals from a summary judgment entered by the District Court, Eighth Judicial District, in which the District Court concluded that, as a matter of law, a defense verdict in the underlying negligence action provided Continental Western Insurance Company (Continental) and Montana Claims Services, Inc. (MCS), with a reasonable basis defense to Grafs subsequent § 33-18-201 et seq., MCA, Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA) claim. Grafs motions to reconsider, alter or amend the judgment were denied. We reverse.

Issues on Appeal

¶2 1. Does the jury verdict in favor of the insureds…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Klaudt v. FlinkMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hall v. HeckermanMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Fisher v. State Farm General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Redies v. Attorneys Liability Protection SocietyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Peterson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Marie Deonier & Associates v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API