Legal Opinion

Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2007No. DA 06-0295PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Bruce A. Miller appeals from an order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (State Farm) and denying Miller’s cross motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it determined that no justiciable controversy existed.

BACKGROUND

¶3 This case arises out of an automobile collision between Miller and Emma Rosh. Miller was injured as a result. Rosh’s liability was not disputed. Miller and Rosh were both insured by State Farm under…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ridley v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Northfield Insurance v. Montana Ass'n of CountiesMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Gray v. Simonson Farmers Ins. ExcMontana Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  2. Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Donaldson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Marshall v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Ill.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Pallister v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API