Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State Farm General Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1999No. 98-353PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

¶ 1 Fred Fisher (Fisher) appeals from the order of the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Sanders County, granting State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm) summary judgment. We affirm.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to State Farm on the basis that Fisher’s Unfair Claims Practices Act (UCPA) claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

BACKGROUND

¶3 In February of 1986, Fisher purchased a homeowner’s insurance policy from State Farm insuring his home, workshop and contents. The policy was in effect in March of 1994, when a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hollister v. ForsytheMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Scott v. RosenthalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Balyeat Law, PC v. HatchMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Funkhouser v. HURRICANE FENCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re B.P.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Touris v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Graf v. Continental Western InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Olsen v. MilnerMontana Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API