Legal Opinion

Marie Deonier & Associates v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2004No. 02-630PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 This matter originally came before this Court in Marie Deonier & Assocs. v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 2000 MT 238, 301 Mont. 347, 9 P.3d 622 (Deonier I). In that appeal, we reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (Paul Revere) and against Marie Deonier & Associates (Deonier). At issue was Deonier’s claim that Paul Revere breached its fiduciary duty owed to her as its agent. We concluded the claim involved issues of material fact precluding summary judgment.

¶2 Upon remand, the District Court conducted a jury trial on Deonier’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Federated Mutual Insurance v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. BloomIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Czajkowski v. MeyersMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re S.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Winslow v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API