Legal Opinion
Independent Pier Co. v. Norton
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 6, 1935No. Nos. 8807, 8809PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
Leave was given to file briefs in these causes, which have now been received. There are two cases which were heard together.
The procedure is the ordinary one of a review of the orders of the commissioner. Motions were made to dismiss the bills because of some failure to comply with the technical rules of pleading enforced by the rules in equity. These motions were disposed of by granting leave to the real plaintiff to correct the formalities of his bill in the features criticized. There were practical reasons for promptly disposing of the cause on its merits.
It was…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Paramino Lumber Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Paramino Lumber Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Clyde-Mallory Lines v. CardilloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
- Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. CardilloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938