Legal Opinion
Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1938No. 8585PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The appellants sued to enjoin a Deputy Commissioner from hearing a claim under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901-950, and a preliminary restraining order was issued. The claimant, Clark, having been permitted to intervene, filed an answer to the complaint. Subsequently, appellants amended their pleading, and the appellees then moved for a dismissal for want of *204sufficient facts to entitle complainants to the relief sought. The court ordered the vacation of the preliminary injunction and granted the motion to dismiss. This appeal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. SchaufflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wilshire Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Paramino Lumber Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Kittrell v. HatterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. RhoadesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1941
- Oliver v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.