Legal Opinion
Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 11, 1940No. 271PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
The question is whether the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment is violated by a private act of Congress directing a review of an order for compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act 1 after there had been a final award by the deputy commissioner and after the time for review of the award had expired.
On January 17, 1931, the appellee Clark fell and. fractured a rib while working on the navigable waters of the United States as a longshoreman' for the appellant Par-amino Lumber Company.' The other appellant, the Union Insurance Company of Canton, Ltd., is…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fleming v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re Chateaugay CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Springdale Convalescent Center v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.