Legal Opinion

Clyde-Mallory Lines v. Cardillo

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 1, 1938No. 714PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This is a libel to invalidate an award made by the respondent Cardillo and an order for a penalty for noncompliance with the award: The case was heard upon the pleadings, the orders hereafter referred to, and a transcript of the evidence before each of two deputy commissioners appointed by the United States Employees’ Compensation Commission under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.

Statements of fact herein are intended as special findings of fact and statements of law as conclusions of law, within Admiralty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gravel Products Corporation v. McManigalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  2. Independent Pier Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. F. Jarka Co. v. MonahanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
  2. Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co. v. FranksMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Stansfield v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. CardilloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
  5. Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co. v. FranksMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API