Legal Opinion

Gomes v. BRISTOL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 22, 1962No. Eq. No. 2977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrost, J.

This is a motion by the petitioner that he be awarded a counsel fee and costs in this court as provided by G. L. 1956, §28-35-32, as amended by P. L. 1961, chap. 134, he having successfully prosecuted his appeal in this court in the above-entitled cause. See Gomes v. Bristol Mfg. Corp., 94 R. I. 500, 182 A.2d 318.

At a hearing on the motion respondent orally raised the question of the constitutionality of §28-35-32 as amended and requested time for filing a memorandum of authorities. The court granted the request and the matter was continued for hearing.

The petitioner asserts that when a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Ahmed's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Farmers' & Merchants' Insurance v. DobneySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Hunter v. FlowersSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Gomes v. BRISTOL MANUFACTURING CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trembley v. City of Central FallsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  2. Sweetman v. Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  3. Cabral v. HallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  4. Fleury v. Kessel/Duff Construction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Hassenfeld Bros., Inc. v. WolowiczSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API