Legal Opinion

Cabral v. Hall

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 8, 1967No. 29-AppealPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•Joslin, J.

This is a petition in which the employee seeks to charge the second injury indemnity fund, hereinafter called “the fund,” with necessary medical expenses in excess of the stipulated medical maxima. A trial commissioner found that the employee was in need of reasonable medical and related services in order to cure, rehabilitate or relieve him from the effects of a compensable injury, and he directed the employer to furnish the following services for the next three years and to pay the following charges therefor: «$30 a week for nursing services, not exceeding $500 annually for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Costanzo v. TillinghastSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Mason v. Bowerman Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
  4. State v. Minneapolis Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Genereux v. PelosiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Town of Scituate v. O'ROURKESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  2. Buffi v. FerriSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Podborski v. William H. Haskell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  4. Pucci v. AlgiereSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  5. Sugarman v. LewisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API