Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Merchants' Insurance v. Dobney

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 6, 1903No. 189PublishedCited by 54 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Having been adjudged to pay the amount of a fire policy written on the dwelling house of the defendant in error, which was totally destroyed by fire, the plaintiff in error prosecutes this writ. The judgment was for $861.40 with interest, costs, and $150 as a reasonable attorney’s fee. • This latter amount was fixed under authority conferred on the court by sections 43, 44 and 45 of chapter 43 of the Compiled Statutes of Nebraska, which are a reproduction of chapter 48 of the laws of Nebraska for 1899. The sections in question are -reproduced in the margin. 1 The allowance of the attorney’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API