Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Flowers

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 23, 1949PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole question to be determined on this appeal is the constitutionality vel non of the provisions of Section 86.06, Florida Statutes 1941, F.S.A., authorizing the recovery of an attorney's fee by a successful claimant in a summary proceeding to enforce a laborer's lien against real or personal property when the laborer is in privity with the owner of such property.

Section 86.06, supra, was enacted into law by Chapter 12079, Laws of Florida 1927, which chapter re-enacted Section 3519 of the Revised General Statutes 1920, relating to the enforcement of laborers' liens, and added thereto an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Ross v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Sasso v. Ram Property ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Sarasota County v. BargSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API