Legal Opinion

Fleury v. Kessel/Duff Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 26, 1988No. 85-387PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Following our decision affirming the Commissioner’s award of workers’ compensation benefits to plaintiff, Glenn Fleury, see Fleury v. Kessel/Duff Construction Co., 148 Vt. 415, 533 A.2d 1197 (1987), the plaintiff sought an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 678(b). The matter was referred to a master who has determined that $3300, an amount agreed to by the parties, is a reasonable fee for representation before this Court. Both parties have differences with the master’s report. Defendant argues that the statute under which the fees are awarded is unconstitutional and, therefore,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. StarlingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Albright v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Morrisseau v. LegacSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Hodgeman v. Jard Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Oxx v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. Ronald Coleman v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Fleury v. Kessel/Duff ConstructionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API