Legal Opinion

Powell v. Security National Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1929No. 18442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

The Security National Bank of Tulsa, herein called plaintiff, began this suit against C. F. Powell for judgment on a promissory note in the sum of $19,000. The note was dated July 15, 1925, payable to the Security National Bank 90 days after date and signed by Powell. Powell filed an answer in which he admitted the execution of tile note, but pleaded substantially the following state of facts; That on or about Slay 19, 1923, he, for the puriiose of securing- funds with which to buy an oil and gas lease, secured a loan from the Liberty National Bank of Tulsa, hereinafter referred to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. McLean v. Southwestern Casualty Ins. Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Weeks v. MedlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  4. Davis v. HoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Downtown Chevrolet Co. v. NiccumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp. v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Mitchell v. Fayette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API