Legal Opinion
United States v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 1999No. Civ.A. 95-601(RMU)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment
The above captioned case arises out of two cases now consolidated into one. The first case, Civil Action No. 95-601, was originally filed by the United States of America against the District of Columbia and William Bennett, a representative patient at Saint Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, D.C. The second case, Civil Action No. 96-2551, was originally filed by a group of patients at Saint Elizabeths Hospital, including Mr. Bennett, against Janet…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muwekma Tribe v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Hubbs v. AlamaoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- United States v. MazzolaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- United States v. AdamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999