Legal Opinion

Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 1982No. 80-1429PublishedCited by 2,338 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

The question presented- is whether respondent, involuntarily committed to a state institution for the mentally retarded, has substantive rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to (i) safe conditions of confinement; (ii) freedom from bodily restraints; and (iii) training or “habilitation.”1 Respondent sued under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 three administrators of the institution, claiming damages for the alleged breach of his constitutional rights.

I

Respondent Nicholas Romeo is profoundly retarded. Although 33 years old, he has the mental capacity of an 18-month-old child, with…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,338 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

2,333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API