Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell
The question presented- is whether respondent, involuntarily committed to a state institution for the mentally retarded, has substantive rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to (i) safe conditions of confinement; (ii) freedom from bodily restraints; and (iii) training or “habilitation.”1 Respondent sued under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 three administrators of the institution, claiming damages for the alleged breach of his constitutional rights.
I
Respondent Nicholas Romeo is profoundly retarded. Although 33 years old, he has the mental capacity of an 18-month-old child, with…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,338 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
2,333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.