Legal Opinion

Muwekma Tribe v. Babbitt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 30, 2000No. 99-3261 (RMU)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Granting in Part the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court upon the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. The plaintiff requests that the court issue a writ of mandamus or other remedy available under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), compelling the Department of the Interior (“DOI”) to complete within twelve months its review of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. Center for Science in the Public Interest v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API