Legal Opinion

Scanlan v. San Francisco & San Joaquin Railway

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1900No. Sac. No. 393PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action brought by a contractor for the construction of a railway embankment, to recover the contract price for the alleged cubic contents of the embankment. The defendant had paid to the plaintiff what it claimed to be the whole amount earned, except about twenty dollars which it brought into court. The plaintiff had judgment for the balance claimed by him, and the defendant appeals.

The contract, among other things, contained the following provisions:

“On embankments a percentage for shrinkage must be added to the fill, and said percentage will be specified and marked out…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. McGregor v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Salinas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Champagne v. A. HamBurger & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API