Legal Opinion
Lippold v. Hart
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 1969No. Civ. 25606PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN J.
Appellants brought this action to recover for personal injuries and property damage suffered in an automobile collision with respondent Frank Hart. After a jury trial had resulted in a defense verdict, appellants’ motion for new trial was denied. Appellants contend that the trial judge improperly denied this motion; we agree, and therefore reverse the judgment.
The accident occurred on February 7, 1966; appellant Florence Lippold, while driving appellants’ automobile, was forced by traffic preceding her to come to a sharp halt on a 4-lane highway. Respondent Frank Hart was driving…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. RobargeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Ehrenreich v. SheltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Gosnell v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Clemens v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Clemens v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Posey v. LeavittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.