Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brugh
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC) filed a petition against respondent, Mark Patrick Brugh, alleging, in three separate cases, the violations of several rules of professional conduct. In accordance with Maryland Rule 16-709(b), we referred the petition to Judge Fred A. Thayer, recalled from retirement, to conduct a hearing and to make findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law. After a hearing held on October 7, 1998, at which respondent was represented by counsel, Judge Thayer prepared and filed his findings and conclusions.
The complaint common to all three cases is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
3Cited by16 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.