Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brugh

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 1999No. Misc. Docket AG No. 33, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC) filed a petition against respondent, Mark Patrick Brugh, alleging, in three separate cases, the violations of several rules of professional conduct. In accordance with Maryland Rule 16-709(b), we referred the petition to Judge Fred A. Thayer, recalled from retirement, to conduct a hearing and to make findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law. After a hearing held on October 7, 1998, at which respondent was represented by counsel, Judge Thayer prepared and filed his findings and conclusions.

The complaint common to all three cases is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API