Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. David

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 27, 1993No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 36, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

Respondent George Franklin David IV was admitted to the Bar of the State of Maryland on 9 December 1982. He maintains a solo, general practice in Baltimore. The events leading up to the present disciplinary action occurred between 1990 and 1992 and involve respondent’s handling of the cases of four former clients.

Petitioner Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC) commenced the present disciplinary action after receiving several complaints from former clients of respondent. The AGC filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action against him in this Court on 19 October 1992. We entered an…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API