United States v. Field
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
Two protests are involved in this case. It is agreed that the appraiser’s reports, which are incorporated in the record, correctly describe the merchandise. As to protest 85809-G he reported:
The merchandise consists of curtains of net composed in chief value of yarn, threads, filaments, or beads. It is embroidered. It is also composed in part of lace, net, or one of the other materials named in the first division of paragraph 1430.
As to protest 91897-G his report was:
The merchandise consists of curtains composed of net, tamboured.
All the merchandise was classified and assessed at 90 per…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pustet v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Smith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Lahey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. American Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. GoldfrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- United States v. TanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Adele v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.