Legal Opinion

Prestigeline v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 12, 1975No. Court No. 74-2-00364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NewmaN, Judge:

This action is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment, and defendant’s cross-motion to dismiss the action on jurisdictional grounds.

The threshold jurisdictional issue raised by defendant challenges plaintiff’s standing to sue; while the merits concern the proper classification of a certain lighting device invoiced as “Multi-Li tes” or as “Closet Lights”, imported from Hong Kong through the port of New York in 1973.

I have concluded that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.

Jurisdictional Issue

The facts pertinent to defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  4. Lyons Export & Import, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. L. Batlin & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. S & T Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  3. Hartz Mountain Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. United States v. Golden Gate Petroleum Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API