Prestigeline v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
NewmaN, Judge:
This action is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment, and defendant’s cross-motion to dismiss the action on jurisdictional grounds.
The threshold jurisdictional issue raised by defendant challenges plaintiff’s standing to sue; while the merits concern the proper classification of a certain lighting device invoiced as “Multi-Li tes” or as “Closet Lights”, imported from Hong Kong through the port of New York in 1973.
I have concluded that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.
Jurisdictional Issue
The facts pertinent to defendant’s motion to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Lyons Export & Import, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- United States v. L. Batlin & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- S & T Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Hartz Mountain Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- United States v. Golden Gate Petroleum Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2006