Legal Opinion

Webber v. Webber

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1948No. L. A. 20219PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. Defendant answered and filed a cross-complaint, but at the trial he offered no evidence in support thereof. Plaintiff was awarded an interlocutory decree of divorce, the custody of the 17-year-old son of the parties, and one-half of the community property, consisting of $50 of postal savings bonds. She has appealed from the “interlocutory judgment,” directing her complaint to “those portions” thereof “which denied [her] . . . provision for her support and maintenance and . . . attorney’s fees for prosecuting said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Peters v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Lamborn v. LambornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API