Legal Opinion

Jones v. Longerbeam

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. Hon. Joseph W. Jokes, Judge. Action by Isaac S. Jones against Elmer A. Rongerbeam on an account. From a judgment for defendant and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant the sum of $655, balance due on account. Verdict and judgment being in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff has appealed. There are numerous items in the account on the part of the plaintiff, and the defendant pleaded counter*626claims involving a number of item;s claimed to be due the defendant from the plaintiff; but upon nearly all of these items there was a conflict in the evidence. Among the items on the part of ithe plaintiff claimed to be due from the defendant was $600 for the rent of certain premises in Minnehaha…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. MacKenzie v. HodgkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Harris v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. McClay v. GluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Share v. CoatsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Walker Drilling Co. v. Carlew Drilling ContractorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Humes v. LVNV Funding, L.L.C. (In re Humes)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
  4. Severson v. FleckDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
  5. Orion Financial Corp. of South Dakota v. American Foods Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API