MacKenzie v. Hodgkin
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—Williams and others were partners under the firm name of Williams, Brown & Co. in the business of commission merchants at the city of Fresno, in this state. On August 31, 1893, they made a contract in writing with Hodgkin, whereby the latter agreed to pick, cure, and deliver to them at Fresno all the grapes and raisins to be produced -that season on a certain vineyard in that vicinity owned by him, said Hodgkin, and Williams, Brown & Co. on their part agreed to pack all the raisins so delivered .and sell the same for Hodgkin, they to charge specified rates of compensation for their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vanderbilt v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Colton Land & Water Co. v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Pugh v. Porter Bros. Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Eureka v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Walker Drilling Co. v. Carlew Drilling ContractorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.