McClay v. Gluck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $1,652.21 for plaintiff, and from the judgment entered on the verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
Action to recover a balance claimed to be due upon a contract for tbe erection of a building, and for extra work on the building. • Plaintiff had a verdict. The evidence was sufficient to justify it. It can hardly be said that any question of law is presented. Parties may by parol modify a written executory contract under seal, either by changing its terms or waiving its conditions, if they have acted under and executed it as so modified. That the parties to this contract agreed on the waivers and modifications claimed by plaintiff, and acted under and executed it accordingly, were questions…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bowman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Blake v. J. Neils Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Jones v. LongerbeamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Youngberg v. LambertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- McKinley v. MacbethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911