Legal Opinion
Lance v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 21, 2005No. CIV.A.04-746(RCL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs Complaint. The defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that portions of the plaintiffs complaint fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendants submitted a motion and memorandum in support of their position. The plaintiff submitted a memorandum in opposition, and the defendants subsequently filed a reply. Upon consideration of the parties’ filings, the applicable…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Lance v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension TrustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Battles v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Winder v. ErsteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Yung v. INSTITUTIONAL TRADING CO.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.